|
Homeland Communications Corporation Update as of July 25, 2011 Pursuant to Judge Marra’s Orders, the Receiver for Homeland Communications has issued checks to court-approved claimants. A total of approximately $648,000 was available for distribution. The total amount of approved claims was approximately $3,403,533.00, yielding a distribution of approximately 19% to each approved Homeland investor.
Notice by David S. Mandel, Esq. Receiver, to All Debtors and Creditors of Homeland and to anyone attempting to communicate with Homeland: On August 3, 2010, Judge Marra issued a Final Judgment Imposing Civil Penalties against Defendants Joseph Yurkin and Frances LaBarre. The Court ordered Joseph Yurkin to pay a $130,000 civil penalty and $785,704 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. The Court also ordered Frances LaBarre to pay a $130,000 civil penalty and $384,324 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. (SEC v. Homeland Communications, et al. DE 182).
The Receiver is presently marshalling assets for the Receivership Estate and completing his collection efforts in order to maximize recovery of victim-investor losses. In the upcoming months, the Receiver will be filing motions with the court to approve monetary distributions to victim-investors.
We appreciate the investors’ patience and cooperation during this complex process. Please continue to check this website for updates on the status of the case and the Receiver’s efforts. On May 24, 2010, Federal District Judge Kenneth Marra issued an “Omnibus Order and Opinion” addressing the Receiver’s Omnibus Report on Challenged Claims (order, EXHIBIT-1, EXHIBIT-2,EXHIBIT-3,EXHIBIT-4,EXHIBIT-5,EXHIBIT-6), as well as objections raised by various claimants. In the Order, the Court ruled as follows: 1) each Homeland investor’s claim limited to the actual dollar amount invested; In addition to the above ruling, the Receiver continues his ongoing efforts to recover lost investor money in order to maximize potential returns to investors. To this end, on February 23, 2010, the Court held Steven Tow in contempt of Court for failing to obey court orders and cooperate in the Receiver’s efforts to recover investor losses (order). On May 20, 2010, the Court held another hearing on Steven Tow’s continuing noncompliance and ordered him to produce additional documents and information to the Receiver. The Court made clear to Tow that potential sanctions for any further non-compliance or failure to provide truthful information to the Receiver could include incarceration. Based on the Court’s rulings and pending the outcome of the Receiver’s efforts to recover investor losses, the Receiver will file a distribution plan for court approval.
We appreciate the investors’ patience and cooperation during this complex process. Please continue to check this website for updates on the status of the case and the Receiver’s efforts.
In addition to the above ruling, the Receiver continues his ongoing efforts to recover lost investor money in order to maximize potential returns to investors. To this end, on February 23, 2010, the Court held Steven Tow in contempt of Court for failing to obey court orders and cooperate in the Receiver’s efforts to recover investor losses; see order here. On May 20, 2010, the Court held another hearing on Steven Tow’s continuing noncompliance and ordered him to produce additional documents and information to the Receiver. The Court made clear to Tow that potential sanctions for any further non-compliance or failure to provide truthful information to the Receiver could include incarceration.
Based on the Court’s rulings and pending the outcome of the Receiver’s efforts to recover investor losses, the Receiver will file a distribution plan for court approval.
We appreciate the investors’ patience and cooperation during this complex process. Please continue to check this website for updates on the status of the case and the Receiver’s efforts.
On October 23, 2009, Federal District Judge Kenneth Marra conducted a hearing for any claimant to raise objections to the Receiver's recommendation of denial of claim. The judge ordered additional briefing from the claimants and from the Receiver. The judge did not issue a final order as to any claim.
Also on October 23, Judge Marra held a hearing in the related matter of David S. Mandel, Receiver v. Donald LaBarre, et al., 08-80079-Civ-Marra. The hearing was on the Receiver's motion to hold Mr. LaBarre in contempt for his continuing failure to provide information to the Receiver. At the conclusion of the hearing, Judge Marra held Donald LaBarre in civil contempt and ordered him remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshal's until Mr. LaBarre complies with the Receiver's discovery requests. The judge also issued an order freezing the accounts of Donald LaBarre, Michelle LaBarre, and Livestock Unlimited. These orders (Order Freezing... and Order Adjudicating...) can be viewed in .pdf format.
If you have any questions, you may contact the Receiver's office at 305-374-7771.
General Information
The offices of Homeland are presently closed. Information is available via this website, which will be expanded and updated as additional information becomes available. On September 5, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a Complaint for injunctive and other relief against HOMELAND COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, FRANCES M. LABARRE, and JOSEPH YURKIN, Defendants, and OAK TREE ESCROW CORPORATION, LUNA PAZZA INC., SMR ACQUISITIONS, INC, SMRDEVELOPMENT.COM, INC., and GLOBAL SURVEY CORPORATION, Relief-Defendants. The Complaint alleged that the Defendants violated the federal securities laws in connection with their ongoing, fraudulent, unregistered offer and sale of securities in the form of units consisting of at least one share of Homeland's common stock and one warrant. Unless immediately restrained and enjoined, Defendants will continue to defraud the investing public and place investor funds at serious risk.
The next day the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, entered a Temporary Restraining Order and Other Emergency Relief freezing all assets of the Defendants and Relief-Defendants, ordering the Defendants to refrain from violations of the federal securities laws and ordering other relief. The text of the Temporary Restraining Order and Other Emergency Relief and be viewed by clicking "Temporary Restraining Order" at the top of this page. On On
Judge Marra granted the Receiver's request to conduct an auction of the relief defendants' property, particularly the equipment and furniture in the Luna Pazza restaurant, and other office equipment. Order re: auction The auction yielded approximately $56,000, which was deposited into the receivership estate's account.
The defendants Frances LaBarre and Joseph Yurkin have signed consents to the permanent injunction brought by the SEC. These consents mean that the defendants are not going to fight the charges brought by the SEC, and that they give up their right to a trial on those charges. The issues of disgorgement of profits and civil penalties have not yet been decided.
The Court entered judgments of permanent injunction as to Homeland and the individual defendants. The Receiver continues to review financial records to search for any assets of the defendants that may be included in the receivership estate.
LITIGATION The Receiver and his advisors are continuing their efforts to recover investor and creditor funds. To that end, the Receiver filed two lawsuits to recover funds for the receivership estate. The case of
In the second case,
The Receiver also settled potential claims with American Express relating to allegations of fraudulent transfers of investor funds. That agreement was approved by the Court. Among the terms of the agreement, American Express agreed to pay $150,000 to the receivership estate, and those funds have been received.
If you are an investor inquiring about your investment in Homeland Communications, please click on "Investors" for further information. You can find the Receiver's status reports by clicking on "Receiver's First Interim Status Report"; "Receiver's Second Interim Status Report"; "Receiver's Third Interim Status Report" and "Receiver's Omnibus Report." |
|
Attention Investors: Please e-mail your contact information to Homeland.Receiver@mandel-law.com |